Showing posts with label Vietnam War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam War. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2009

MLK’s Words Changed Our World

NewsOne, 1-14-09

   
   

By CASEY GANE-MCCALLA

(Editor's note - Today, January 15, would have MLK's 80th birthday.)

Martin Luther King, Jr. might be the greatest orator in American history. His words and speeches changed America forever. Not only did his speeches address integration, but King also gave powerful calls to action on poverty and the war in Vietnam. Here are MLK's Top 5 Speeches.

1. I Have A Dream.

This is one of the most well known and referred to speeches in modern American history.

2. Why I Am Opposed To The War In Vietnam.

Many people forget about King's strong anti-war stance. Many of the reasons he opposed the war in Vietnam relate to the current conflicts in Gaza and Iraq.

3. I Have Been To The Mountain Top.


King's last speech was prophetic. He would die the next day but his words would live on and inspire people forever.

4. The Urgency of Now.

In a theme later used by Barack Obama, King showed why integration couldn't wait.

5. A Time to Break Silence.

In this speech, Martin Luther King again outlined his opposition to the war in Vietnam.

(Casey Gane-McCalla is a writer, rapper, producer and actor, and the assistant editor for NewsOne.)

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

The GOP Must Denounce Rush Limbaugh

NewsOne, 12-29-08

The Rest of Us Should Boycott Clear Channel

By CASEY GANE-MCCALLA

With the recent scandal involving Chip Saltsman, a candidate to run the RNC, and his distribution of Rush Limbaugh's mix CD, which contained the song "Barack the Magic Negro," it is high time for the Republican Party and America as a whole to reject and denounce Rush Limbaugh.



"Barack the Magic Negro" is hardly the most offensive thing that Rush Limbaugh has said and is hardly the strongest tie that Limbaugh has had to the Republican party.

Limbaugh is a bigot, a sexist, a hypocrite and a xenophobe. He stirs up fear and hate in his listeners. He preys on the disenfranchised and uneducated and turns their resentment against blacks, feminists, immigrants, and liberals. For a sampling of Limbaugh's most racist quotes against blacks, click HERE. Limbaugh has also managed to offend Latinos, saying Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa reminded him of a shoe shine boy and also saying in reference to Hugo Chavez, "A Chavez is a Chavez. We've always had problems with them."

Limbaugh's prejudice does not only extend to minorities. He also has discriminated against women, who happen to make up the majority of this country. He has said, "Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society," and also, "We're not sexists, we're chauvinists — we're male chauvinist pigs, and we're happy to be because we think that's what men were destined to be. We think that's what women want."

Rush Limbaugh has long acted as the de facto spokesman for the Republican Party, the self-appointed voice of conservative broadcasting, saying what mainstream party figures mean to say but won't for fear of being deemed politically incorrect.

The GOP has continually given him their approval. George W. Bush has appeared on Limbaugh's show several times, as has his brother Jeb. GOP Uncle Toms like Condoleezza Rice and Clarence Thomas have also appeared on his show, along with Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. Former White House Press Secretary Tony Snow has not only appeared on Limbaugh's show, but has served as a replacement host for Limbaugh, as has Matt Drudge.

It's amazing how few Republicans have come forth to criticize Limbaugh. When rapper, Ludacris referred to Hillary Clinton as a bitch, Fox News criticized him for a whole news cycle, yet when Limbaugh repeatedly referred to Clinton as a "B-I-itch," Fox News kept quiet. Meanwhile, John McCain asked Obama to publicly condemn John Lewis for rightfully comparing the crowds at McCain/Palin hate rallies to those drawn by George Wallace, but never condemned Rush Limbaugh for comparing Obama to Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, linking Democrats to Al Qaeda, and labeling feminists as Nazi's.

In 2000, John McCain bravely stood up to 'agents of intolerance' on the Right such as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. However by the 2008 campaign, he had turned into a yellow-bellied coward. Despite the fact that Limbaugh criticized him heavily throughout the primaries, John McCain has never spoken out against Limbaugh.

In 2007, Limbaugh, who avoided the Vietnam draft because he "did not want to go," said that soldiers who did fight for their country and returned home to criticize the war (after seeing the death and carnage there) were "phony soldiers." Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called on his fellow Senators to condemn the remarks. John McCain's response? "I did issue a statement saying that I thought it was inappropriate, and perhaps Mr. Limbaugh didn't mean it, but he should not have said it." Hardly a condemnation.



McCain had another chance to condemn Limbaugh's statements last year when the Obama campaign ran an ad using Limbaugh quotes like, "Mexicans are stupid and unqualified," and "Shut your mouth or get out (of this country)." The ads referred to Limbaugh as one of McCain's Republican friends. McCain could have issued a statement saying that Limbaugh was not one of his friends and that his views did not represent the McCain campaign or the Republican Party, but instead he stayed quiet for fear of pissing off the dittoheads.

McCain had one last chance to distance himself from Limbaugh on Meet The Press shortly before the election, when Tom Brokaw played a clip of Limbaugh saying that Colin Powell's endorsement of Obama was all about race and asked McCain if he agreed. McCain could have said, 'I know Colin Powell and have been friends with him for many years. While I disagree with his endorsement, it is ludicrous to insinuate that a man who has given so much service to his country would endorse a Presidential candidate based on his skin color.' By repeatedly refusing to criticize Limbaugh, McCain has shown that he either shares Limbaugh's bigoted views or is too cowardly to renounce them.

One of the most disturbing things to know about Rush Limbaugh is that his program airs on Armed Services Radio. Given the fact that the army is 24% Latino and 12% black, Limbaugh is offending more than a third of our enlisted soldiers. Is Limbaugh the voice of America we want represented on our military airwaves? Do we really want someone broadcasting to our enlisted soldiers who said Abu Ghraib was just a fraternity prank, and compared a wounded Iraq vet who appeared in TV ads against the war to a suicide bomber?

Many of Limbaugh's supporters have defended him by saying his statements are made in a humorous context. When someone like the character Borat makes racist, sexist or anti-semetic comments, it falls in the category of humor because we know that Sacha Baron Cohen doesn't mean it and is using the character to show the stupidity of prejudice. However, with Limbaugh, it is quite clear that he stands by his statements and it is minorities and women who are the butts of his jokes, not his own racism and sexism.

If the GOP is to truly move into the 21st century, they must cut all ties to bigots like Rush Limbaugh. When the President, Vice President, Vice Presidential candidates, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Senators, Governors, and Supreme Court justices all appear on the show of a hate-spewing racist, sexist pig, it does not reflect well on their political party.

While Limbaugh might have a large base, it is not as large as the base he offends. By attacking blacks, Hispanics, feminists and liberals he is alienating more than half of the country. Not only blacks and Hispanics, but every white person who has an African-American or Latino relative, loved one, hero or friend.

Throughout the campaign, Obama was repeatedly asked to denounce people he associated with because of their statements. Whether it was Ludacris, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, or Rep. John Lewis. Obama repudiated them all but Lewis. Now, it is the Republicans' turn to speak out.



Pleases write to your Senators, Representatives, and Governors, and ask them to publicly denounce Limbaugh for his racism, sexism, xenophobia and disrespect, and to cancel his contract with Armed Services Radio. It is ridiculous that any part of our tax money goes to this rich, mean spirited bigot...and ridiculous that our brave soldiers are forced to listen to him.

Is there any Republican brave enough to criticize or acknowledge Rush Limbaugh's bigotry, or has the party traded in its fiscal conservatism and family values for hatred and racism?

I urge all leaders in the African-American and Latino communities as well as leaders of the women's movement to protest Limbaugh. When we went after Don Imus, we targeted the wrong bigot. Limbaugh makes Imus look like he works for Air America.

I'm also calling for a boycott of all Clear Channel stations. Clear Channel is the parent company of Limbaugh's show. The corporation's president, Mark P. Mays, recently defended Limbaugh for his 'phony soldiers' comment. Please e-mail him with you questions and concerns about Limbaugh at MarkPMays@clearchannel.com. You can also call Clear Channel with your concerns at 1-210-822-2828. And please call the local stations in your area that carry Limbaugh's show.

(Casey Gane-McCalla is a writer, rapper, producer and actor, and the assistant editor for NewsOne.)

Monday, November 29, 1993

Unintended Consequences of U.S. Involvement in the Korean War

The U.S. Response to the Korean Invasion of 1950: A Study of Predetermined Policy Implementation and Unintended Consequences

On June 25, 1950, the Cold War turned hot. The battleground was Korea, a country divided into U.S.-Soviet spheres of influence since 1945, and hostilities were initiated when North Korean troops crossed the 38th parallel and invaded South Korea. Acting on the assumption that the North Korean government was a Kremlin puppet regime, and the invasion therefore a clear case of Soviet-backed Communist aggression (Hunt, p 5), the U.S. response was swift. President Truman committed U.S. air and naval forces to the defense of Korea on June 27, and ordered U.S. ground troops based in Japan to proceed to Korea on June 30 (Ambrose, p 121).

However, the U.S. response to the June 25 invasion also included a series of other regional foreign policy steps which went far beyond what was necessary for the immediate defense of South Korea. The U.S. Seventh Fleet was dispatched to the waters surrounding Formosa (Taiwan), ostensibly to prevent any Chinese communist attack on Formosa. U.S. forces stationed in the Philippines were strengthened and increased military aid was provided to the Philippine government, at the time engaged in crushing the nationalist peasant Huk movement (Ambrose, p 119/Document 14). U.S. military aid was also further extended to the French, then fighting Ho Chi Minh's nationalist Vietminh in Indochina.

Taken together, these additional steps lend credence to the hypothesis that the outbreak of fighting in Korea presented U.S. policymakers with a pretext for implementing previously-agreed upon Cold War foreign policy objectives. Meeting with President Truman and his other advisors on June 25 and 26, Secretary of State Acheson was quick to spell out the numerous additional steps he thought should be taken to ensure regional security as part of the U.S. response to the Korean invasion, obviously initiatives long-planned and agreed to without debate or surprise from the President.

No wonder, since they fit perfectly with the foreign policy prescriptions contained within the Truman Administration's own NSC 68 of April, 1950, which essentially called for the U.S. "to assume unilaterally the defense of the non-Communist world...to assume the role of world policeman" (Ambrose, p 113). This meant a doubling or tripling of the U.S. defense budget, which stood at less than $13 billion in 1950 (Ambrose, p 112).

At this point in Cold War history, two of Truman's political objectives converged: the need to justify such greatly increased defense expenditures and his political need in the face of then-emerging McCarthyism to prove to the country that he and the Democrats were not soft on Communism. A Communist tide seemed to be rising in the Far East: Japanese Communist demonstrations against American military bases in Japan; the fall of China to the CCP and subsequent Nationalist retreat to Formosa, where a Chinese Communist invasion seemed imminent; full-scale civil war in Vietnam between the French and Communist/Nationalist Vietminh; "petty dictator" Syngman Rhee's loss of popular support in U.S.-backed South Korea and growing demands for immediate unification from the Communist-controlled North (Ambrose, p 116-118). It was obvious to Truman that bolstering his anti-Communist credentials and "the whole package envisioned in NSC 68, in short, could be wrapped up and tied with a ribbon by an Asian crisis" (Ambrose, p 116).

This does not imply that the North Korean invasion was a U.S.-fabricated event, as most historians have labeled the Tonkin Gulf incident of 1964 - although a case could be made that U.S. officials such as Secretary of State Dean Acheson may have encouraged the North Koreans to act by making public statements to the effect that South Korea was strategically peripheral to the U.S. Nor does it point to the existence of a conspiracy in the Truman Administration to hide these other regional foreign policy initiatives from the U.S. public. The additional steps taken by the U.S. in the days following June 25 were initially justified as necessary in case the Korean invasion was only a prelude to a wider regional conflict (Hunt, p 5). In any event, these measures were all in keeping with previous publicly stated U.S. Cold War containment aims.

Regardless, these additional security measures had long-range consequences for U.S. foreign policy. Specifically, increased military and intelligence aid to the Philippine government resulted in U.S.-guided suppression of the nationalist Huk movement, a peasant movement based more around legitimate land reform grievances than Marxist-Leninist ideology. It laid the groundwork for direct U.S. involvement in the election of a string of Philippine rulers more responsive to U.S. interests than the interests of their own people, the first being Ramon Magsaysay (elected in 1953), and later, the corrupt dictator Ferdinand Marcos (Bonner, p 38-44).

In Vietnam, the extension of U.S. military aid to the French announced by President Truman on June 27, 1950 marked the beginning of three decades of tragic U.S. involvement in Indochina. This particular initiative, ostensibly aimed at containing communism and thus protecting U.S. interests, would ultimately bear fruit in the form of more than 58,000 American lives lost, over 300,000 wounded, an estimated 1.6 million civilian and military Vietnamese deaths, more than 2 million killed in Cambodia during the turmoil of the 1970s, and a total cost to the U.S. government over twenty-five years of more than $150 billion in pre-1975 dollars (Vadney, p 341).

The preceding facts and statistics underscore the lesson inherent in this tale of unintended consequences. In the long-term interests of our nation's security and relations with the world around us, American policymakers must learn the wisdom of allowing policies conceived behind closed doors to undergo vigorous public debate before proceeding with their implementation.


Monday, November 15, 1993

The War in Vietnam Was Censored by the Mainstream Media

The U.S. press, particularly television news, is credited with bringing the Vietnam War home to millions of Americans, thus inciting their impassioned opposition. Walter Cronkite's doubts about the war, which he voiced on-air following the 1968 Tet offensive, are often considered to have turned the tide of public support against the war.

However, before mid-1967 not even tentative criticism of U.S. war aims or policies appeared in the mainstream media. Even when many respected sources began to express their dissent, the media continued to give the administration's views on the war the largest amount of coverage.

From 1945 to 1954, the United States spent several billion dollars supporting a ruthless French colonialism in Vietnam, but the American public was never informed of this. In the following decade Washington assumed full responsibility for the maintenance of the South Vietnamese right-wing dictatorship, but the public neither read nor heard a word of debate in the media about this major policy commitment.

In 1965 the U.S. government began a massive buildup of ground forces in Vietnam, but Americans were told the troops were merely a small support force. The New York Times and other major news agencies knew the real nature of the escalation but felt it was in the "national interest" to keep this information from the public.

As press critics have pointed out, the media, with few exceptions, censored the worst of the war, saying almost nothing about the massive saturation bombings of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, the "free-fire" zones, U.S.-sponsored torture, the Phoenix death squad program, the massive destruction of Indochinese rural life, the indiscriminate killing of the civilian population, and the dumping of 12 million tons of Agent Orange and other toxic chemicals on the countryside.

Even in the final years, media coverage was remarkably unwavering in its support for the war. A survey of the editorial stance of thirty-nine leading American newspapers at this time found that while several eventually became more critical of the U.S. military escalation, not one advocated withdrawal from Vietnam, despite the strong antiwar sentiments expressed by millions of people in the U.S. and abroad.

A study of TV coverage between 1968 and 1973 found less than a quarter of the stories of a 180-program sample concerned Vietnam, and only rarely did the stories include pictures of combat. Pictures of the dead or wounded were featured in only about 2 percent of war-related reports; American battlefield dead were never shown; body counts appeared only as pictureless statistics. A study funded by the U.S. Army in 1988 rejected the notion that negative press coverage was responsible for eroding public support for the war. The American people were alienated not by the news coverage but by the casualties.

After the war, the news media tried to put the best face on U.S. involvement, describing it as either a well-intentioned venture gone awry or a foolish mistake.

"Left out of this view was any thought that (our leaders) had waged a horrific war in support of a dictatorship and against a largely civilian population to prevent a popularly supported but (communist) social order from gaining power." (Parenti, p 176).

Relying on the establishment news media, America was left with the impression that the U.S. defeat in Vietnam, rather than the murderous intervention itself, was the only thing Americans needed to regret.



Source: Inventing Reality: The Politics of News Media by Michael Parenti (1986)

Tuesday, December 22, 1987

War Toys Are Revving Youngsters Up To Die

Over the past few years, increasing objections to the recent flood of children's toys which glorify aggression, violence, and war have been voiced by concerned parents and activist groups across the nation.

The sale of war toys has been steadily rising since the reintroduction of Hasbro's G.I. Joe in 1982 as "Real American Heroes," a product line of five-inch action figures and high-tech weaponry. The older G.I. Joe, originally manufactured as a foot high doll, had been removed from the market following the Vietnam War's end in 1975. A spokesperson for the War Resisters' League, the first national organization to take action against the current crop of war toys, explained last year that at that time, G.I. Joe "declined in popularity because the reality of war was very clear to people." In the age of Reagan it seems this reality has been once again whitewashed by an administration intent on revving youngsters up to die in Nicaragua, the Philippines, etc.

War toy sales amounted to a record $1.2 billion in 1985, a year during which Transformers, Gobots, G.I. Joe, Voltron and Masters of the Universe made up five of the top six selling toys in the United States. Continuing through 1986, war toys accounted for more than half of the twenty top selling toys.

Unquestionably, then, there is a huge demand for such war-oriented playthings. What irreparable harm do they cause boys and girls? The only child-development studies which have focused on the psychological effects of war toys show that children clearly exhibit more hostile and anti-social behaviors after playing with toy guns or militaristic toys than after playing with board games, stuffed animals or engaging in other "non-threatening" activities.

With the emergence of television shows which star many of today's most popular toys, including all five of the war toys listed above, the crucial creative element of a child's play is encouraged to take a back seat to imitative behavior. If children watch their favorite toy characters act out scenarios on television, it is likely that their play will comprise, to some extent, a re-enactment of such scenarios.

Blatantly false concepts are projected and reinforced by most war toy lines and promotional tv episodes, most notably G.I. Joe's half-hour television program. Here's a recent critique of this show, printed in an anti-war toys newsletter:

"Violence abounds, but none of the elite Joes ever die. Cobra Commander is the Joe's faceless enemy. His allies include the Baroness, who has a heavy Russian accent, and another sporting an eye patch. Most of the other enemies have foreign accents, are disabled or are dehumanized in some way. There are token Joes of different ethnic groups and colors, and a few are women, but most are white men, unlike the real military."

The program's basic premises thus feed children images which are disturbing, at best. It desensitizes war, as do all war toys, teaching that weapons do not cause good people to die and that one need not face the consequences acts of violence bring, as long as they are on the side of "the good guys". By presenting the enemy as foreign and disabled, and proselytizing that it is acceptable for the faceless enemy to die, this show follows in the tradition which during WWII portrayed the Japanese troops as "little brown monkeys" and the Vietcong in later decades as barbaric "gooks," in order to remove traditional taboos against killing from the psyches of our nation's own enlisted men. The program teaches children to unconsciously distrust people with disabilities, while idolizing those who are "perfect physical specimens." Female Joes are consistently portrayed in skin-tight clothing, sporting large breasts, and are delegated to using their feminine wiles and charms as weapons of deception...time and time again it is only the male Joe members who are "privileged enough" to experience combat.

Other war-oriented toy lines also manage to portray women in this predictably sexist sense. The advertised description of Katherine Taylor, the romantic interest of Coleco's Rambo figure, reads as follows: "She wants to be treated just like one of the boys, but she sure doesn't look like one!". So not only do war toys legitimize aggression and desensitize children to the dangers and harm of violent actions, they foster racist and sexist attitudes as well. It's the same old nationalistic, militaristic slop being shoved down our throats once again. War toys are profitable pieces of plastic propaganda that the military-industrial ruling class would love to see in the hands of every young and impressionable American.



Sources:

Donnelly, Kate. "Stop War Toys Campaign Targets G.I. Joe". Peacework, Nov 1987, p. 7.

Field, Jana. "The War Toy Debate". People's Daily World, 24 Dec. 1986, p. 16-A.

Rodriguez, Johnette. "War Toys". The Newpaper, Mar 25-31 1987, p. 3.

Monday, October 26, 1987

Why the Children of the 80s Will Make The 90s Look Like the 60s

(Editor's note from 2013: this analysis got the demographics wrong, because in 1987 I didn't realize I was smack dab in the middle of Gen X, the children of the baby bust, and smallest generational cohort of modern times. The millennials were the kids I was unwittingly referring to, and their influence wouldn't be felt until the year 2000. I got the name of Reagan's successor wrong, but not the fact that it would be another conservative Republican. I predicted military involvement in Panama two years ahead of our 1989 invasion, and intervention in the Middle East, although George H.W. Bush plunged us into war with Iraq, not Iran. Also, AIDS never became a health crisis that threatened the hetrosexual majority in the U.S., but I based that prediction on information available at the time. But for all the mass media stereotypes about our generation being a slacker nation, the early to mid 90s saw more student activism flower than at any time since the 60s, so in that respect I called it right.)

Born to the most populous generation our country has ever known, the sons and daughters of most "baby boomers" are only now amidst their stormy adolescence. I feel that a definite parallel can be drawn between American social conditions of the 1950s and 1980s, and therefore see no reason why large numbers of this "boomlet" might not soon participate in another wide ranging and significant counterculture explosion. Hey, the signs are there....and in the wake of eight long years of Reaganism a double-barreled blast of radicalism may be just what is needed to rid this country of irrationalism and injustice.

For the youth of this country, the 1950s were smothered by an atmosphere of overwhelming conformity, apathy and boredom. Many Americans of this period viewed themselves as living in an affluent, stable society, in which success was guaranteed to those who ingrained themselves within the system. This attitude stifled both creativity and dissent, in addition to fostering a society founded on materialistic ideals. A look at our own time reveals that recently, these conditions have reappeared within our nation. Young people of the 1980s are passive observers, uninformed about matters of concern. Like their predecessors of the 1950s, they are pre-beatnik, pre-radical, pre-hippie youngsters who within ten years, assuming all goes as predicted here, will play an active role in this country's next wave of mass rebellion/resistance.

The youthful idealism of many baby boomers was shattered during the 1960s by several key events, not the least of which were the massive and continuous U.S. involvement in Vietnam and the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963. I do not think that the turbulent 1990s will explode in reaction to either a catalyzing event the likes of JFK's untimely death, nor a common cause such as a straightforward desire to end a specific war. Rather, children of the 1980s will rebel when the tide of irrationality is simply too much to bear....or rather, in response to a combination of unfortunate conditions. I foresee the conservative policies and measures which will be implemented by the Dole administration following the Senator's ascension to our presidency in 1988 as one of these conditions; the crisis which will arise as the AIDS virus completely infiltrates our nation's heterosexual population (and deaths multiply tenfold, into the hundreds of thousands) as another; and direct military involvement in many global areas (including the Phillipines, Iran, and Panama) as still more developments which might radicalize the youth of our time.

So, will (among other things) a backlash against the realization that we have elected another leader in pursuit of ill-minded policies spark this next rebellious wave of which I speak? Obviously the American Left is currently but a shriveled ghost of its past, and certainly in no position to pose a serious threat to any misguided champion of conservatism in 1988. Returning to our 1950s-1980s parallel, I would place the state of our nation in A.D. 1987 as corresponding approximately with that of 1960. Only recently has the renewed voice of youthful (and not-so-youthful) protest begun to be heard, and as the next few years unfold, other conditions which fostered the spirit of rebellion may duplicate themselves as well. Already there are other student revolutions taking place in far-flung nations for American radicals of tomorrow to emulate....witness South Korea, for one. Young, bearded visionaries make good, liberate homelands....sound familiar? Is Nicaragua another Cuba in its salad days, before Fidel lost his mind....in other words, a working socialist society which may inspire countless numbers of disaffected youth? Born and raised in the 1980s, American youth of today will come of age in the 1990s amidst an explosion the likes of which has been absent from our society for far too long.

Monday, February 9, 1987

Before YIPPIE: How Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin Became Revolutionaries

(Editor's note from 2014: When this paper was written, I was a 15 year-old high school student, and Abbie was my hero of the moment. Why, then, when I shook his hand after hearing him speak at Brown University later that year (alongside Timothy Leary, facing down a former head of the DEA on the subject of Reagan's War on Drugs) didn't I take him up on his offer to meet with him and some other young activists later on at a nearby coffeehouse and talk politics? The truth is, I couldn't stick around only because I was trying to get laid. I'm sure Abbie would have appreciated my horny teenage reasoning, but not getting to hang with him that night remains one of my life's biggest regrets.)

__________

If you believe yippies existed you are nothing but a sheep.
- Abbie Hoffman, 1968

New Year's Day, 1968 saw the birth of an idea which was soon to catapult the revolutionary antics of two radical activists, Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, to nothing short of worldwide attention. On this morning in a small apartment located amidst the hippie kingdom of New York's Lower East Side, "in a burst of inspiration induced by severe acid hangovers"1, these two first conceived the mythical concept known as Yippie! (with invaluable assistance from their wives and local underground newspaper editor Paul Krassner).

In an article which appeared in Krassner's paper Realist on July seventh of that year, Hoffman stated that the entire Yippie! myth was created to serve as "a connecting link which would tie together as much of the underground as was willing into a national get-together"2 at the upcoming Democratic National Convention to be held in Chicago, "to make some statement (especially in revolutionary action-theater terms) about LBJ, the Democratic Party, electoral politics and the state of the nation in general."3

But Yippie! outlived the chaotic Festival of Life which took place that summer in Chicago and came to signify much more as the decade drew to a close, lending meaning and direction to the disruptive brand of humorous "monkey-warfare" previously developed by its radical co-founders. According to an exhaustive survey conducted in 1978, their bizarre and exciting tactics "combined the hedonistic elements of the counter-culture with political purpose," and were admired by or influenced over two thirds of those who identified in some way with the 1960s.4

The noticeable lack of a rigid ideological doctrine, the usually irrelevant forms of behavior and general confusion associated with the Youth International Party which arose with Yippie! was what easily distinguished Rubin and Hoffman's mythical brand of cultural revolution (the"politics of ecstasy") from that espoused by formal movement organizations such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Both activists refused to dispel the clouds of distortion which invariably gravitated towards Yippie! events. "Distortion is essential to myth-making...because understanding is the first step to control and control is the secret to extinction,"5 said Hoffman. "Were we hard-core, dangerous revolutionaries", asked Rubin, "or cute and obnoxious goof-offs? Nobody could pin us down, and that was our survival loophole."6

Yet despite the absurd image Yippie! helped to project, the philosophy and goals of its originators were oriented towards nothing less than a struggle for the complete reorganization of all existent social and political orders. In an interview conducted nearly twenty years after that fateful New Year's Day in 1968, Hoffman confessed:

"I still believe in the redistribution of wealth and power in the world. I believe in universal hospital care for everyone. I believe that we should not have a single homeless person in the richest country in the world. And I believe that we should not have a CIA that goes around overthrowing governments and assassinating political leaders, working for tight oligarchies around the world to protect the tight oligarchy here at home."7

These beliefs were not born with the Yippie! idea, just as they were not abandoned by Hoffman in favor of others more acceptable or newsworthy after the Yippie! Festival of Life that summer in Chicago and his subsequent trial for conspiracy to incite riot (along with Rubin and six others) the following year. Rather, the flamboyant style of protest and dissent employed by Hoffman and Rubin and defined by the concept of Yippie! was a unique hybrid resulting from previous years each spent engrossed in organizing for movement activities and causes from anti-war political campaigns and civil rights involvement to money burning and mass marijuana mailings. It is this chapter in Yippie! background and history which will be examined in detail here.

From delinquent to civil rights worker

Abbott Hoffman entered the world on November 30, 1936 as the first-born son of a large, closely-knit Jewish family. He was raised in the working-class suburb of Worcester, Massachusetts amidst a cultural home life which endowed him with a sense of Jewish identity he was never to forget. As a child, he suffered from asthma yet by 11 had outgrown all of its psychosomatic symptoms.

During Hoffman's teens the first indications of his rebellious nature surfaced throughout his educational career in the form of noticeably delinquent behavior. At sixteen he was converted to atheism by an older friend and subsequently expelled from high school following a scuffle which broke out when his English teacher destroyed a lengthy dissertation he had written exposing his heretical religious views.

His sexual experiences as a teenager were numerous as well. Once, he was stabbed in the thigh when ambushed by a jealous rival for his sweetheart Suzie's widespread affection. During a brief autobiographical section8 included in his 1968 manifesto, Revolution For the Hell of It (honestly enough entitled "Ego Tripping"), Hoffman bragged to the contrary that this scar was received during a violent "gang fight" experienced amidst this early period of his social rebellion.

Following a two year stint at the prestigious Worcester Preparatory Academy, Hoffman enrolled in the intellectual paradise of nearby Brandeis University where he studied under the greatest liberal minds of the fifties, among them Herbert Marcuse, Max Lerner, Frank Manuel and Abraham Maslow. In 1959 he was accepted by the University of California at Berkeley as a graduate student in psychology. Here was to come Hoffman's first exposure to radical ideas and behavior, which together with two events of May, 1960 would serve to "mold (his) consciousness forever."9

The first of these events occurred on May 1 with the failed appeal and execution at San Quentin Prison of Caryl Chessmen, a rapist whose conviction rested on circumstantial evidence and who had become a symbol for the battle against capital punishment. The second happened a week later when Hoffman became embroiled in the student riots which greeted the opening of House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) hearings in downtown San Francisco. The hearings, held to investigate alleged subversive activity in the Bay Area, were supposedly open to the public, but admittance actually required identification distributed by local conservative organizations. The melee which ensued when huge crowds of students were denied admittance was described by Hoffman as follows:

"There was an elite special force of riot police called the goon squad. Each member stood six feet or better, in solid black leather, crowned by a white crash helmet with a plexiglass visor. Each carried a club. There were water-hose teams. Some had a device called the "knee bender". You hooked it around a person's wrist and turned it once. The person fell to his knees in pain...a second turn broke the bone. The force of the water hoses drove people smashing into plate-glass windows. Students were clubbed to the ground, thrown off balconies, and kicked in the face. A pregnant women was thrown down a flight of stairs. All around there was panic. People ran into stores. The tall black-leather shapes pursued, swinging their sticks. Screams filled the air. Four blocks from the riot, all was calm. No one seemed aware that the century's most turbulent decade had begun."10

Hoffman was deeply influenced by his Berkeley experiences, but following the unplanned impregnation of his college sweetheart Sheila, he returned east during the fall of 1960, back to Worcester and a disastrous six-year marriage. During a visit to local Clark University he spoke out in protest during the showing of an official HUAC documentary which attempted to blame San Francisco unrest on a handful of Communist agitators. Subsequently, he accepted the task of touring Massachusetts with the film as an ACLU representative.

Between jobs as a psychiatrist at Worcester State Hospital and manager of a local theater, Hoffman joined efforts to elect H. Stuart Hughes, co-chairman of the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE), as Massachusetts senator in 1962. 146,000 voter signatures were collected to insure him a third party position on November's ballot, but immediately preceding the election the Cuban missile crisis developed and with it, the collapse of Hughes' anti-military campaign.

In 1963 Hoffman first became involved with the growing civil rights movement through Worcester's branch of the NAACP. With other dedicated organizers he established a CORE chapter, set up landlords for discrimination suits, picketed stores which refused to hire black employees and was responsible for policy changes and other actions which within months had earned the chapter a deservedly militant reputation. He then enlisted as a Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) worker in 1964 and headed south, where he was arrested several times in the year that followed for work in gearing up for the upcoming Democratic National Convention to be held in Atlantic City. He returned to Mississippi the following summer to find a divided movement soon to shift northward and with the rise of Black Power to purge white activists from its upper ranks. Hoffman participated during these final months in numerous local demonstrations, sit-ins and anti-discriminatory campaigns, in which violent beatings were the order of his movement existence.

From cub reporter to Berkeley dropout

During these years of Abbie Hoffman's early involvement with dissent, his future comrade Jerry Rubin had not yet been exposed to the growing protest movement. Born in 1938 and raised in a post-war city neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, Rubin was first acquainted with politics through teenage admiration of Adlai Stevenson's 1952 Presidential candidacy and with activism by virtue of his father's work as a union organizer, yet it was not until his 1964 arrival in Berkeley that his own career as activist would begin. Rubin failed to excel in high school athletics, opting instead for journalistic work as the sports editor of his school paper.

This led to a job at age 17 as a cub reporter with the Cincinnati Post and Times Star, a position he held for five years. During this time, Rubin rose in prominence on the staff from feature writer to editor of his own two-page youth section in addition to carrying a full load of course work at the University of Cincinnati. After studying the out-dated policies and management techniques in use at the paper he developed several proposals with underlying socialist themes, calling for collective employee ownership of his newspaper employer. These suggestions, devised by Rubin as early as 1957, served no further purpose other than to label him a communist in the eyes of most senior staff members.

In August of 1960, Rubin's mother succumbed to the cancer she had battled in three successive operations since her condition was diagnosed in 1954. He completed his studies at the university and traveled to India nine months later, returning home after only a few weeks when reached by news that his heartbroken father had died as well. Following the funeral Rubin and his thirteen year old brother Gil moved to Jerusalem, where he enrolled in Hebrew University as a graduate student in sociology.

The year and a half he was to spend in Israel radicalized him through exposure to socialist ideals and sympathizers, preparing Rubin for the lifestyle which awaited. In late 1963 he returned with his brother to the United States with plans to continue his graduate work at the University of California.

Upon his arrival at Berkeley in January of 1964, Rubin dived headfirst into fledgling movement activities. "Within two weeks (he) had met every radical in town...running from group to group asking a million questions about politics and the movement, putting it all down in a notebook. Some people thought he was a cop."11 He dropped out after six weeks of classes and soon became involved with an illegal trek undertaken by eighty volunteers to witness firsthand the reforms brought about by Cuba's recent Marxist revolution.

After braving a circuitous route to Cuba via Paris and Czechoslovakian airlines, Rubin arrived in Havana to find the young Cuban revolutionaries' "abstract dreams transformed into reality...former casinos and fancy hotels converted to cost-free homes and schools for the poor. The entire society was putting into practice the Christian ideal of fellowship."12 He returned to the United States inspired by the casual governing style, spirit of aliveness and enthusiasm exhibited by Fidel Castro and Minister of Labor Che Guevara.

A month after Rubin's return to Berkeley, the Free Speech Movement arose following a decision by University officials to enforce a previously ignored ban on recruiting for political activity of any sort on campus grounds. It was opposition to this decision which led to the suspension of five student activists, all members of civil rights groups such as SNCC and the campus chapter of CORE who attempted to defy the ban on the afternoon of September 30, 1964.

A second attempt later that day to again ignore the ban resulted in the arrest of drop-out Jack Weinburg, at which point 200 students surrounded the police car in which he lay imprisoned and sat down. The student demonstrators' number quickly swelled to upwards of 3000 who refused to disperse and for the next 30 hours huddled together listening to impassioned speeches delivered first by Mario Savio and then dozens of others from atop the car. The sit-down, which ended with the unconditional release of Weinburg, catapulted the FSM to national attention and marked the beginning of Rubin's transition from participant to organizer.

During further actions, such as the sit-in at Sproul Hall which arose in protest to disciplinary actions taken against Savio for his role in the police car incident and resulted in the arrest of over 800 demonstrators, his level of movement involvement grew. Following the massive student strike which closed the university in November, Rubin was named by campus officials as one of six non-students responsible for a sit-in and was sentenced to 45 days imprisonment despite testimony from police that he did nothing but smile during the event in question. It was this conviction which led to his association with Stew Albert, fellow conspirator and leading spokesman of the anti-war Vietnam Day Committee.

Under the VDC banner Rubin assisted with the organization of Vietnam Day, "a nonstop thirty-six-hour marathon teach-in which drew 20,000 students to listen to Senator Ernest Gruening, Dick Gregory, Phil Ochs, Norman Mailer, Isaac Deutscher and I.F. Stone...an incredible event with songs, speeches, debates and an empty chair signifying the State Department's refusal to attend."13 Further VDC actions, conducted from a six room dilapidated house located near the Berkeley campus, included the disruption of troop-laden trains passing through town enroute to nearby Oakland (the nation's military shipping point for Vietnam) and the largest demonstration in the history of Berkeley in which a crowd of 20,000 attempted to shut down the Oakland Army Terminal.

Novelist and LSD pioneer Ken Kesey was invited by the VDC to speak at the day-long teach-in of October 15, 1965 which preceded this massive event, an invitation he responded to in full force with his acid-crazed band of Merry Pranksters. Kesey's address to the crowd immediately preceded the signalled beginning of the march, but instead of the fiery anti-war oration all had expected to hear he delivered a rambling five minute speech on the futility of rallies and marches amidst a Prankster backdrop of assorted harmonica notes and noise.

"There was no way one could prove Kesey had done it. Nevertheless, something was gone out of the anti-war rally. The VDC tried to put in one last massive infusion of the old spirit and the great march on Oakland began. At the Oakland-Berkeley line the protesters were met by an arrow-shaped phalanx of police and National Guard. The VDC marched in a frantic clump at the head, trying to decide whether to force a physical confrontation or turn back when they were ordered to. Nobody seemed to have any resolve...and in the end the huge march turned around and headed for Civic Center Park in Berkeley and stood around there listening to music from Country Joe and the Fish wondering what the hell had happened."14

Following the abortive march on Oakland, "the energy drained from the anti-war movement...the VDC house rattled like an old skeleton...and the spirit once ours was restored to Mother Earth."15 Rubin ran for mayor of Berkeley in 1966 when shortly before the election he realized that no one from the movement was challenging the ultra-conservative incumbent. His campaign included pro-marijuana and anti-war platforms, as well as proposals to create a "rotating mayoralship with everyone taking turns as mayor for a day."16 He finished second in a field of four candidates, winning four student precincts with 22% of the vote.

In August of that same year, Rubin had been subpoenaed to testify before HUAC concerning VDC activities in Berkeley which right-wing Congressmen had publicly labeled as treasonous. He appeared dressed as Thomas Paine and handed out copies of the Declaration of Independence to astonished federal marshals and members of Congress..."successfully engaging the enemy in symbolic warfare. A delicate form of protest art, symbolic warfare insists one must love one's country in order to overthrow its government."17 Following four days of disruptions and affronts to the dignity of HUAC, the hearings were cancelled before an outraged Rubin could testify.

After speaking with Allen Ginsberg and Timothy Leary as "a representative of the Berkeley radicals" to hippies in attendance at San Francisco's first Be-In (Golden Gate Park, 1967), from whom he received a "cool reception,"18 Rubin spent thirty days in jail for a demonstration in which the limousine of General Maxwell Taylor was splattered with cow's blood. Following his release he received a call from Dave Dellinger, pacifist coordinator involved with the National Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam (MOBE), inviting him east to serve as project director for the MOBE anti-war demonstration planned for that October in Washington, D.C., and within a week was enroute to New York and his future Yippie! destiny.

Road to New York City

Abbie Hoffman had undergone a transformation while Berkeley seethed (both with protest and the antics of student radical Rubin), gradually evolving from non-violent civil rights activist to a full-fledged cultural revolutionary. In the spring of 1965 he had served as coordinator for a descendant of John and Samuel Adams and anti-war sympathizer Thomas Adams' primary campaign for the office of Democratic senator from Massachusetts. SNCC's reorganization at the time around the leadership of young black organizers such as Stokely Carmichael, prompted Hoffman (acting with Adams' approval) to invite Stokely north for a speaking appearance to show Adams' support for the militant Carmichael's already criticized radical platform of promised reforms. This campaign position marked his last foray into the world of conventional political tactics, and ended abruptly a few months later with Adams' loss in the primary.

Hoffman also worked that year to establish northern wholesaling connections for the distribution of handmade cloth and leather goods produced by the Poor People's Corporation (PPC) of Mississippi, a network of rural cooperatives. A PPC booth he and other SNCC workers set up at the 1966 Newport Folk Festival was one night dismantled and demolished by drunken police who then proceeded to attack and arrest SNCC organizers and Freedom Singers present to elicit support for movement activities from performers. The outrage which immediately developed among the festival population led to a hasty dismissal of all charges and "bizarre retribution in the form of public police penance the following morning."19

His efforts on behalf of PPC led Hoffman to New York during the fall of 1966 with intentions of creating a northern outlet for the Mississippi cooperatives' goods and products. Under his direction such a store was established and christened Liberty House at its opening in a renovated double storefront located in the West Village. Following the purge of whites from SNCC leadership at the winter 1966 conference, Abbie wrote an article attacking Black Power which urged that the struggle be re-defined in broader terms of class rather than race. The Village Voice published this article as a liberal argument in favor of an integrated civil rights movement. He soon reconciled with Stokely and other SNCC organizers, however, and by spring 1967 had followed their advice urging him to "turn over Liberty House to black management and organize around ending the war in Vietnam."20

He met Anita Kushner, a well-educated former psychology major, through work during his final months on the PPC payroll and fell hopelessly in love. They were married in Central Park in June of 1967 and rented a small apartment amidst the growing East Village hippie community, shortly before Hoffman's final break with Liberty House. This departure marked the end of his active civil rights involvement and the beginning of his career as revolutionary life-actor.

Hoffman soon took interest in the growing youth community which had begun to develop on New York's Lower East Side. His organizing efforts initiated over the issue of widespread police harassment with a leafleted call for participation in an immediate community discussion. Further actions which arose from this and other mass meetings included the formation of patrols to monitor city police, establishing bail funds and crash pads, attending to bad acid trips and organizing around local issues such as Gem Spa's nickel raise in the price of malted egg creams. Following a marijuana bust of twenty or so East Side blacks one Saturday night in 1967, he laid down to block the precinct station entrance until dragged inside by several officers, where he demanded arrest in a show of solidarity with the previously detained offenders. Although reluctant at first to comply, the Captain promptly jailed Hoffman when he shattered a nearby trophy case window with a deftly placed kick from his well-worn combat boots.

With the outbreak of rioting in Newark during early 1967, Hoffman established a shuttle service transporting from ten to fifteen truckloads of free food, clothing and blankets each day from the Lower East Side to local SNCC and NCUP (Newark Community Union Project) workers. He aided in the distribution of these supplies and alongside a work force of west coast Digger activists assisted with existent ghetto organizing as well. He established a counter-culture communications center with help from Jim Fouratt, a fellow organizer who along with Hoffman had just been fired from shortlived city positions as liasons between city hall and the East Village community, to "fill the information gap through reams of poetic and psychedelic street literature"21 dealing with topics of interest and local concern from upcoming rock concerts to venereal disease epidemics.

His successful efforts in publicizing and popularizing mass gatherings such as hippie-style weddings were again repeated with the Easter Sunday Be-In at Central Park which drew more than 35,000 assorted citizens. During the spring of 1967 he also assisted with the renovation of a Bowery location which was to become the Free Store. This concept was borrowed from Digger originators and ex-Mime Troupers of San Fransisco such as Peter Berg and Emmett Grogan, with whom he had only recently become acquainted. Various community beautification projects were organized throughout the summer with his help, including tree plant-ins and one city sweep-in joined by over 2000 people during which "an entire Manhattan cross street was made to sparkle."22

In response to a massive April 15, 1967 MOBE rally which drew 700,000 for a march on UN headquarters in New York, a right-wing Support Our Boys rally was organized and held in May of that same year. Hoffman was among a Lower East Side "flower brigade" contingent numbering less than twenty who received official permission to participate in the scheduled parade yet was denied a police escort. Subsequently, the entire group was mobbed and beaten by hostile conservative bystanders. In retaliation the following week, another march was planned during which over thirty bags of garbage were brought to the recently opened Lincoln Center (located in downtown Manhattan) and scattered in the elegant courtyard fountain. This event, billed by Hoffman as a "cultural exchange program," made headlines around the city and served as a prelude to the summer hijinks which were to catapult him to national attention.

Street theater as revolutionary art

August 24, 1967 marked what Abbie termed as "my first nontraditional organizing venture,"23 an incident in which two dozen or so long-haired hippies and fun-loving tourists drove the money changers from their Wall Street temple by throwing $300 in one dollar bills onto the gallery floor of New York's Stock Exchange from the balcony railing above. Following this event, the first of many symbolic "monkey-warfare" skirmishes later associated with Yippie!, the hippies proceeded outside to hold court for the eagerly awaiting press, in front of whom they joyously burned still more dollars and proclaimed the "end of money."

Stew Albert and Jerry Rubin had arrived in New York that morning and had only just been introduced to Hoffman when he invited them both to assist with the theatrical assault. That night the hippies received international publicity and Rubin "fell in love with the bundle of energy known as Abbie Hoffman."24

Three weeks later, officials responded by enclosing the visitors' balcony with bulletproof partitions and metal grillwork at a cost of $20,000 for what an exchange spokesman referred to as "security reasons."25

Next, Hoffman and other East Side organizers masterminded an attack on Con Edison, New York's all-powerful utility company. Soot bombs were planted in offices, smudge bombs set afire amidst crowded lobbies and signs plastered about indicating that "BREATHING IS BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH". During the summer of 1967 he also organized the War Is Over celebration which drew 2000 to Washington Square Park, reasoning that "if you don't like the news, make up your own."26 Police were caught unaware when the rally surged through nearby streets after counting down from one hundred to zero (and the end of the war), allowing for chaotic swarms of celebrants to charge Fifth Avenue and deceive thousands into believing that peace in Vietnam had actually come.

Inspired by these zany escapades of protest, multitudes of others joined in the growing outbreak of theatrical direct action. Witches in black robes exorcised the FBI building of its "evil spirits", hundreds filled the lobby of the NY Daily News during a mass smoke-in, panhandlers periodically entered crowded banks to scatter handfuls of change across floors and mice were released at a Dow Chemical stockholder meeting. A group comprised of mostly teenagers who were later to adopt the "crazies" label (which arose from erroneous media coverage of a Washington counter-inauguration held for Richard Nixon in January, 1969) infiltrated an Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) dinner posing as waiters and waitresses, proceeding then to deliver pigs' heads to Hubert Humphrey and other shocked liberals among the likes of J. Kenneth Gailbraith and Edmund Muskie.

Exorcism of the Pentagon

It was the more conventional organizing efforts of the National Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam, however, which were to provide a nationwide outlet for this new brand of guerrilla theater. On October 21, 1967 over 100,000 were drawn to Washington D.C. for a three-day exorcism of the "evil" five-sided Pentagon, coordinated by the MOBE steering committee of which Hoffman and Rubin were so vital a part.

During the September press conference at which MOBE plans for this event were announced, the media was led to expect massive occurrences of disruption and violent confrontation, yet was completely unprepared for the crazed actions promised by Col. Jerome Z. Wilson of the Strategic Air Command (posing as one Abbie Hoffman):

"He assured the newsmen that a crowd of holy men would 'surround the Pentagon, chanting and beating drums, and the Pentagon will rise in the air. When it reaches 300 feet, all the evil spirits will fall out.' Col. Wilson, who had recently dropped out of SAC because of 'bad vibrations,' also revealed that marijuana, already planted on the Pentagon lawn, would be ready for harvest by October 21. 'We will defoliate Washington's cherry trees and turn the Potomac River purple,' he added."27

When Washington police announced they were prepared to repel demonstrators with mace, Hoffman and Rubin responded by informing the press of a potent new sex drug possessed by anti-war forces, LSD combined with DMSO (a skin penetrating agent) which when applied externally caused subjects to disrobe and become sexually aroused. Skeptical reporters were invited to a demonstration the following night where they witnessed an orgy which "spontaneously erupted" when couples were squirted with the drug, known as Lace, in reality nothing more than purple-tinged disappearing ink stocked by local novelty emporiums.

A permit was received early in October which would allow MOBE forces to stage the massive demonstration, but which granted permission to raise the Pentagon itself only ten feet rather than the requested three hundred. Martin Luther King, Benjamin Spock and scores of other respected figures spoke in the hours preceding the actual Pentagon march and siege. Following an initial surge which overwhelmed lines of police defense and brought protesters within yards of the Pentagon walls, most obvious military resistance and brutality towards demonstrators ceased, surfacing again only during next two nights when TV cameras had vanished. Most mainstream participants in the march had dispersed with the first nightfall on Friday, and by midnight Sunday only 500 remained to be arrested when the MOBE permit expired. Nonetheless, this event had provided Hoffman and Rubin with the exposure and large-scale experience needed to set the stage for their planned Festival of Life at Chicago the following summer.

The Pentagon's levitation (which Hoffman claimed to have actually witnessed early Sunday morning) served as the final transition for both from mere creative and effective organizers to Yippie! warriors destined to play important roles in events soon to shape the nation's consciousness and to disrupt its very fabric.


END NOTES

1 Abbie Hoffman, Soon to be a Major Motion Picture (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1980), 137.

2 Free (Abbie Hoffman), Revolution For the Hell of It (New York: Dial Press, 1968), 102.

3 Ibid.

4 Rex Weiner, et al. Woodstock Census (New York: Viking Press, 1979), 243.

5 Free, 65.

6 Jerry Rubin, Growing Up at 37 (New York: M. Evans, 1976), 68.

7 Matthew W. Wald, "At 50, his radical fervor hasn't diminished," The Providence Journal, 8 February 1986, A-20.

8 Free, 199.

9 Hoffman, 39.

10 Ibid., 41.

11 Rubin, Growing Up, 73.

12 Ibid., 74.

13 Ibid., 76.

14 Tom Wolfe, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test (New York: Bantam, 1968), 200.

15 Jerry Rubin, Do It! (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1970), 46.

16 Ibid., 47.

17 Hoffman, 128.

18 Rubin, Growing Up, 80.

19 Allen Katzman, ed., Our Time (New York: Dial Press, 1972), 289.

20 Hoffman, 82.

21 Ibid., 96.

22 Ibid., 97.

23 Katzman, 290.

24 Rubin, Growing Up, 81.

25 Free, 191.

26 Hoffman, 110.

27 Rubin, Do It!, 70.


SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

Alpert, Jane. Growing Up Underground. New York: William Morrow, 1981.

Dellinger, Dave. More Power Than We Know: The People's Movement Toward Democracy. Garden City: Doubleday, 1975.

Diggins, John P.. The American Left in the Twentieth Century. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1973.

Epstein, Jason. The Great Conspiracy Trial. New York: Random, 1970.

Esler, Anthony. Bombs Beards and Barricades. New York: Stein and Day, 1971.

Evans, Mark. Will The Real Young America Please Stand Up. Harrisburg: Stackpole, 1973.

Farber, Jerry. The Student As Nigger. New York: Pocketbooks, 1970.

Feigelson, Naomi. The Underground Revolution: Hippies, Yippies, And Others. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1970.

Foss, Daniel. Freak Culture: Life-Style And Politics. New York: E.P. Dutton, 1972.

Free [Hoffman, Abbie]. Revolution For The Hell Of It. New York: Dial Press, 1968.

Gregory, Dick. Write Me In!. New York: Bantam, 1968.

Hastings, Max. The Fire This Time. New York: Taplinger Publishing Company, 1969.

Hoffman, Abbie. Soon To Be A Major Motion Picture. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1980.

---. Square Dancing In The Ice Age. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1982.

---. Woodstock Nation. New York: Vintage Books, 1969.

Hoffman, Abbie, Jerry Rubin, and Ed Sanders. Vote. New York: Warner, 1972.

Hoffman, Abbie, et al. The Conspiracy. New York: Dell, 1969.

Kakonis, Tom, and Ralph Desmarais. America: Involement or Escape. Menlo Park: Cummings Publishing, 1971.

Katzman, Allen, ed. Our Time. New York: Dial Press, 1972.

Keniston, Kenneth. Youth And Dissent. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.

Melville, Keith. Communes In The Counter Culture. New York: William Morrow, 1972.

Rice, Donald L., ed. The Agitator. Chicago: American Library Association, 1972.

Royko, Mike. Boss: Richard J. Daley Of Chicago. New York: Signet, 1971.

Rubin, Jerry. Do It!. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1970.

---. Growing Up At 37. New York: M. Evans, 1976.

Weiner, Rex, and Deanne Stillman. Woodstock Census. New York: Viking Press, 1979.

Wolfe, Tom. The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test. New York: Bantam, 1968.

MAGAZINE ARTICLES

"A Yippie Comes In From The Damp." Time, 15 Sept. 1980: 22.

Beck, Melinda. "Abbie Hoffman Rides Again." Newsweek, 15 Sept. 1980: 41-42.

Brenner, Marie. "Jerry Rubin's Last Chance Salon." New York, 8 June 1981: 16-20.

Goldman, Peter and Gerald Lubenow. "Where The Flowers Have Gone." Newsweek, 5 Sept. 1977: 24-30.

Hoffman, Abbie. "America On $0 A Day." Ramparts, Feb. 1971: 48-55.

---. "Steal This Author." Harpers, May 1974: 42-45.

Hoffman, Abbie and Anita Hoffman. "Love Letters From The Underground." Esquire, April 1976: 106-108 + 154-155.

Kalb, Bernard. "Life's Little Circus." The New Republic, 159 (Dec. 15, 1968): 8.

Lipst, Seymour M. "Why Cops Hate Liberals - And Vice Versa." The Atlantic Monthly, March 1969: 76-83.

Mano, D. Keith. "Rubin Redux." National Review, 30 Sept. 1983: 1224-1226.

Nachman, Larry David. "The Movement Seeks A Mass." The Nation, 11 Jan. 1971: 39-41. "Network." The New Yorker, 28 March 1983: 31-32.

Rosenbaum, Ron. "Yippies Return With A Blast." Rolling Stone, 30 April 1981: 8-9.

Vaughan, Roger. "The Straight Word On Abbie Hoffman"s Hair" Life, 22 Oct. 1971: 77-78.

NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

"Amy Carter, Hoffman Give Trial Strategy." Providence Journal, 7 January 1987: 3.

Andelman, David A. "Radicals Plan Strategy For National Convention." New York Times, 5 March 1972: 48.

Broder, David S. "Street Warfare In Washington: A Costly Distraction." Providence Journal, 18 May 1971: 28.

Buckley, Tom. "War Protest: Reports Of Its Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated." New York Times, 24 April 1971: 4.

De Gramont, Sanche. "Our Other Man In Algiers." New York Times Magazine, 1 November 1970: 30 + 112-114.

Halloran, Richard. "Vietnam: The Mayday Tribe V. The U.S. Government." Sunday New York Times, 9 May 1971: E-3.

Holles, Everett R. "Open Hostility In San Diego Greets Vanguard Of Activists Planning Protests At National Convention Of G.O.P." Sunday New York Times, 19 March 1972: 51.

Kennedy, Eugene. "The Year That Shook Chicago." New York Times Magazine, 5 March 1978: 27-36.

Kifner, John. "Chicago 7 Defense Files Appeal Brief." New York Times, 28 Feb. 1971: 14.

Naughton, James M. "200,000 Rally In Capital To End War." New York Times, 25 April 1971: 1-4.

Royko, Mike. "A Zippie Affair." Providence Journal, 10 Oct. 1972: 28.

Salpeekas, Agis. "Detroit Radicals Face Bomb Trial." New York Times, 17 Nov. 1971: 49.

Sirica, Jack. "Free Speech Movement Stirred Up A Decade Of Protest." Providence Journal, 16 Sept. 1984 B-1 + 4.

Spaner, David. "Interview With Abbie Hoffman." Overthrow, Summer '86: 1 + 11 + 14 + 17.

Wald, Matthew L. "At 50, His Radical Fervor Hasn't Dimmed." Providence Journal 8 Feb. 1986: A-20.

Rogues Gallery

All Posts by Category

Tags

#ChapelHillShooting #MuslimLivesMatter (1) $400 haircuts (3) 1960s (1) 1980s (1) 1984 (1) 1988 elections (1) 1989 (1) 1990 elections (3) 1992 elections (1) 1993 (3) 1994 elections (1) 1996 elections (3) 1998 elections (1) 2000 elections (3) 2004 (7) 2004 elections (2) 2008 (32) 2008 congressional races (2) 2012 elections (3) 2014 elections (13) 2016 elections (7) 527 groups (1) 9/11 (4) 9/11 first anniversary (1) Abba Eban (1) Abbe Raven (1) Abbie Hoffman (2) ABC (1) abortion (3) action alert (7) activism (2) advertising (2) advocacy (1) affair (4) Affordable Care Act (1) affordable housing fund (1) afghanistan (2) Age of Obama (1) AIDS (1) AIDS victims (2) AIPAC (1) al gore (2) Al Sharpton (1) Alec Guettal (3) alienation (2) Alison Lundergan Grimes (1) alternative energy (10) Alzheimer's (1) amanda marcotte (2) American Left (4) Americans for Limited Government (1) Americans For Prosperity (1) Amnon Rubenstein (1) andrew young (3) Angelo Robinson (1) anti-communism (1) anti-gay bigotry (1) anti-gay violence (1) anti-immigration activists (2) anti-science (1) anti-Semitism (1) anti-vaccine (1) anti-vaxxers (1) anti-war (6) appeal to southern voters (1) apprentice (1) Ariel Sharon (1) Ashley Todd (2) assassinations (2) Astroturf (1) atheism (1) attack ads (5) attack on voter rights (4) Australia (1) autism (1) average Americans (1) baby boomers (1) baby formula (1) bank of america (1) bankruptcy reform (1) barack obama (24) Barry Commoner (2) BBC (1) Benghazi (1) Benjamin L. Ginsberg (1) Bensonhurst (1) Berkeley (1) Beth Ising (2) bi-racial coalition (1) Biden-Palin Debate (1) big banks (1) big money (4) bigotry (7) bill clinton (6) bill donohue (1) Bill Hedrick (1) Bill O'Reilly (1) billionaires (1) Billy Bragg (1) Black Cultural Center (1) Black Lives Matter (4) black voters (7) Blan Holman (1) block the vote (1) bloggergate (1) bloggers (1) blogosphere (1) Bob Dole (1) Bob Iger (1) bob johnson (1) body cameras (1) books (3) Borders (2) BP (2) Brad Blog (1) Brad Friedman (1) Bruce Braley (4) budget deficit (1) bush (7) Bush Administration (2) bush administration misconduct (3) bush donor (1) bush on steroids (1) bush v. gore (1) California (1) Camilo Padreda (1) campaign feud (1) campaign finance reform (8) campaign gaffes (2) campaign scandals (4) campaigns (1) can edwards win (3) canvassing (1) capitalism (2) Catalyst (5) censorship (5) Cesar Chavez (1) Chad Taylor (1) Channel One (1) chapel hill (7) chapel hill town council (3) Charlie Black (1) Charlie Crist (1) Chatham County (1) chemical industry (2) children (1) chris hughes (1) Chris Whittle (1) Christine O'Donnell (1) CIA (3) CIA recruiting (1) CIA torture report (1) citizen participation (1) Citizens United (1) civil disobedience (2) civil rights (7) civil rights movement (1) civilian casualties (2) Civitas Institute (1) class issues (1) Clean Up Congress (1) Clear Channel (2) Clinton Administration (3) code words (1) Cold War (1) colin powell (1) Colin Small (1) college campuses (2) colonialism (1) columbia (1) community reinvestment (1) community reinvestment act (1) concentration of mass media ownership (4) Concord (1) congress (7) conservation (1) consumer fraud (2) consumers (2) Coors (1) corporate accountability (8) corporate front groups (1) corporate giveaways (2) corporate greed (1) corporate influence (4) corporate media (2) corporate misconduct (8) corporations (8) corruption (1) counter-inaugural (1) CRA (1) cra-nc (2) Craig Hicks (1) CRomnibus (2) crony capitalism (1) cross burnings (1) Crossroads GPS (1) Cuba (1) cuban exiles (1) cultural imperialism (1) Dale McKinley (1) damage control (2) Dana Rohrabacher (1) dark money (3) Darren Wilson (2) David Ball (2) David Brower (1) David Dellinger (1) David Duke (1) David Horowitz (1) Deah Barakat (1) debates (1) Debbie Cook (1) demagogues (3) democracy (6) Democratic Convention (1) democratic nomination (15) democratic party (2) Democrats (2) Denis Hayes (1) deregulation (1) detainees (1) Dick Cheney (1) dictatorships (1) dirty tricks (4) discrimination (1) Disney (1) disparate treatment (1) diversity (1) divisive politics (3) Dominican Republic (1) Donald Rumsfeld (1) donald trump (4) dumpstering (2) durham (2) e-mail (2) early voting (2) Ebola (2) economic inequality (2) economic issues (1) economy (4) ed meese (1) Ed Rollins (1) Edison Project (1) edith childs (1) education (2) edwards affair (4) election day 2008 (1) election fraud (1) electoral college (1) Eliot Spitzer (1) Elizabeth Dole (1) elizabeth edwards (2) Elizabeth Warren (3) Emily Lawson (1) employee pensions (1) end racism (4) energy independence (9) entertaining ourselves to death (5) environment (15) environmental pollution (5) environmental racism (2) Eric Garner (2) Eric Holder (1) Eric Odell (2) Ericka Kurz (21) evan bayh (1) Executive Orders (1) expenditures (1) exploitation of 9/11 (2) Exxon Valdez (1) factory farming (1) Faux News (1) FBI (1) Fear (1) fec (1) feminism (1) Ferguson (3) Fidel Castro (2) field plan (1) financial house of cards (1) fire (1) Fire From The Mountain (1) firebombing (2) fired up (1) first openly gay elected official in south (1) Florida (1) florida recount (1) foreign policy (1) Fox News (1) fraud (1) fraudulent inauguration (2) Frederick Douglass (1) Free Speech Movement (1) freedom songs (1) friend (1) fuel efficiency (1) fundraising (2) gary hart (1) gay (6) gay history (2) gay marriage (1) gay-baiting (4) Gaza (2) gen. david petraeus (1) gender equality (1) general election (23) Generation X (1) George H.W. Bush (9) George Norris (1) george w. bush (12) Geraldine Ferraro (1) Germany (2) gerrymandering (1) get-out-the-vote (3) GLBT community (1) global warming (2) GOP (27) GOP Slime Machine (10) GOTV (3) government harassment (1) government secrecy (1) great recession (1) greed (1) Greg Orman (1) grocery store (1) ground game (1) ground zero (1) GSE's (1) guerrillas (1) guest workers (1) Gulf War (5) gun violence (1) h+r block (1) hackers (2) Hamas (2) Harriet Ann Jacobs (2) Harris Wofford (1) Harry Blackmun (1) Harry Truman (1) Harvey Gantt (6) hate crimes (1) hate-mongering (3) hatred (3) health care reform (4) hedge funds (2) Helen Caldicott (2) Henry Hyde (1) Henry Kissinger (1) Henry Louis Gates Jr. (1) hero (1) Hezbollah (1) hillary clinton (14) historical amnesia (1) history (1) hit the road jack (1) HMO's (1) Ho Chi Minh (1) hoaxes (1) Holocaust (1) home foreclosures (1) homophobia (1) housing (1) Howard Rich (1) HR 1461 (1) Huks (1) Human Rights Campaign (1) hurting communities (1) i feel pretty (1) iit’s a wonderful life (1) immigration (4) immigration action (1) immigration reform (3) Inauguration Day 2009 (1) Incidents In The Life of a Slave Girl (2) income inequality (1) Indigo Girls (1) industrial agriculture (1) industrial revolution (1) integration (1) intelligence community (1) international relations (1) Invasion of Panama (1) Iowa (4) iowa caucuses (1) Ira Magaziner (1) Iran/Contra scandal (1) iraq (2) iraq war (4) iraq war costs (2) Irgun (1) ISIS (1) Islamic State (1) Islamophobia (1) Israel (5) Israeli Labor Party (1) Israeli-Palestinian conflict (6) James Bay II (1) James Carville (1) james watt (1) January 20 2001 (2) January 20 2009 (1) jeb bush (3) Jenn Karson (1) Jenny McCarthy (1) Jeremiah Wright (1) Jerry Falwell (1) Jerry Rubin (1) Jesse Helms (13) jesse jackson (3) Jessecrats (1) Jesus de Galindez (1) JFK Assassination (1) Jill Biden (1) Jim DeMint (1) Jim Hunt (3) Jimmy Langman (3) job losses (3) joe biden (3) joe herzenberg (3) Joe Sestak (1) joe trippi (1) John Boehner (3) john edwards (12) john kerry (4) John Lennon (1) John Locke (1) John McCain (16) John Moody (1) john poindexter (1) John Raese (1) John Reich (1) John Sinclair (1) Joni Ernst (5) June 24 1973 (1) justice (2) justice for all (1) Justice for Mike Brown (1) Kansas (2) Karl Marx (1) Karl Rove (5) Kay Hagan (4) Kayla Mueller (1) Ken Calvert (1) Kentucky (1) Kirti Shastri (1) KKK (1) Koch brothers (4) Korean War (1) Ku Klux Klan (2) labor unions (2) Lakota Woman (1) Lamar Alexander (1) Larry Kissell (1) Latin America (2) Latinos (2) Lawton Chiles (1) lazy journalism (1) Lebanon (1) lee c. wilson (1) legal system (1) Lehman Brothers (1) lesbian (1) liberation theology (1) Libya (1) Likud (3) Linda Brent (2) Lisa Abbott (3) lobbying (1) Louisiana (1) love child scandal (2) lynching (1) macaca moment (1) MAJIC (1) Mandy Carter (1) Marco Rubio (1) Mark Chilton (2) Mark Kleinschmidt (1) Mark Penn (1) marketing (2) Martin Frost (1) Martin Luther King Jr. (1) Mary Brave Bird (1) Mary Crow Dog (1) maternity leave (1) Matt Czajkowski (1) max cleland (1) mayor of franklin street (1) mbna (1) McCain missteps (2) McCain VP (7) McCarthyism (1) McDesperate (4) measles (1) media (2) media bias (3) media failed to inform (2) media hysteria (1) media monopolies (3) medical insurance industry (3) Medicare (1) melissa mcewan (1) memorial (1) Menachem Begin (2) mentor (1) merger (1) Michael Bell (1) Michael Brown (3) Michael Stipe (1) Michele Bachmann (1) Michelle Bachmann (1) michelle malkin (1) Michigan (1) middle east (1) Miguel Recarey (1) Mike Castle (1) Mike Easley (2) Mike Hummell (1) military-industrial complex (3) Millennials (1) Milton Wolf (1) minimum wage (1) mission not accomplished (1) Mitch McConnell (3) Mitt Romney (6) Mobil (2) molly ivins (1) money (1) Moral Majority (3) MOVE (4) multiculturalism (1) multinational corporations (2) Muslim Americans (1) mybo (1) NAACP (1) Nat Turner (1) Nathan Sproul (1) Native Americans (2) nc (4) NC Legislature (1) NC MOBE 96 (1) NC PDP (1) neo-nazis (1) Nestle (1) netroots (3) New Left (1) New Orleans (1) New World Order (1) New York City (3) Nicaragua (2) no justice no peace (1) No More Bushes (1) nobama democrats (1) non-profits (2) North Carolina (23) North Korea (1) nuclear industry (3) Obama Inauguration (1) Obamacare (1) Obsession DVD (1) OCAW (1) occupied territories (2) October 28 2007 (1) offshore drilling (1) Ohio (1) oil (10) oil industry (6) oliver north (1) Omar Cabezas (1) online organizing (1) oppression (2) oprah (1) organizing (12) Orlando Bosch (1) Osama Bin Laden (1) ots (2) outrage (1) overconsumption (1) Palestine (1) pandagon (1) pat buchanan (1) Pat Roberts (2) Pat Toomey (1) patriarchy (2) Paul Wellstone (1) payday lending (1) peace (4) peace is patriotic (1) Peggy Young (1) Pennsylvania (2) Penny Rich (1) Peter King (1) petition (2) pharmaceutical industry (1) Phillipines (1) phonebanking (1) phony billionaire (1) picketing (1) PIRGs (1) PLO (2) police accountability (4) police brutality (5) police oversight (4) political committees (1) political consultants (1) political heroes (1) polls (1) pottersville (1) President Obama (4) presidential campaign (30) privatization of education (2) pro-war propaganda (1) profits (1) progressive Democrats (3) progressives (1) property (1) protest (2) protests (6) Public Citizen (1) public health (2) public opinion (2) publishing industry (2) pulp (1) pulping (2) PUMA (1) race card (1) race relations (5) race riots (2) racism (22) racist terrorism (1) radicals (2) Rafael Trujillo (1) rally (1) ralph nader (3) RALs (1) Rand Paul (2) ray charles (1) reading list (3) reagan's racism (1) recall elections (1) recession of 1991-92 (2) recession of 2008 (1) redbaiting (1) redistricting (1) refugee camps (1) refund anticipation loans (1) reproductive rights (1) Republican National Convention (2) republican party (2) Republican Study Committee (1) returns (2) revolution (1) rich donors (2) Richard Fink (1) Rick Santorum (1) Rick Scott (1) rielle hunter (2) Right Wing (11) right wing Republicans (11) RIP (3) rip-off (1) Robert McCulloch (1) Robert Mercer (1) Robert Redford (2) Robin Hayes (1) ronald reagan (2) Ruby Sinreich (1) rudy giuliani (1) ruling class (1) rush limbaugh (3) Sabra and Shatilla Massacres (1) Sam Brownback (2) same-sex marriage (1) Sandinistas (1) Sarah Palin (14) SAU (1) savings and loans (1) Scamdal (1) schools (1) Scientology (1) Scott Brown (1) SDS (2) SEAC (20) selected not elected (1) Senate races (10) sept. 11 (4) sept. 11 2002 (2) sexism (2) Sharron Angle (1) Sheldon Adelson (1) Shimon Peres (1) single payer health system (2) Six-Day War (1) slaveholders (1) slavery (2) Smithfield Foods (1) social movements (1) social networking (1) solar panels (1) soul music (1) south carolina primary (4) Soviet Union (1) spat (1) Sprint (1) Stand With Peggy (1) state governments (1) Steve Scalise (1) Steve Schmidt (3) stolen election (5) stop bush (1) StopBrownback (1) strange incidents (2) street theatre (1) Student Action Union (1) student activism (19) student voting (3) students (11) subprime lending (1) super PACs (2) superdelegate petition (2) superdelegates (2) supreme court (5) susan baylies (1) swine flu panic (1) Syria (1) take action (16) tax code fairness (2) Tea Party (8) Ted Cruz (3) terrorism (2) Terry Sanford (1) The Revolt (1) The Zionist Dream Revisited (1) these guys (1) third world (3) Thom Tillis (3) Thomas Frank (1) Threshold (8) tim kaine (1) Time Warner (1) tobacco industry (1) Tom DeLay (1) Tongass National Forest (1) Tony Coelho (1) Tony Mazzocchi (1) torture (1) Troopergate (1) trump was born wealthy (1) U.S. power structure (2) UNC-Chapel Hill (5) undocumented immigrants (2) unemployment (1) United Kingdom (2) universal healthcare coverage (6) unprovoked war (1) UpStairs Lounge (1) uranium mining (1) US foreign policy (2) US support for Israel (2) vaccines work (1) Vandana Ramaswamy (1) VANISH (1) veepstakes (4) vice president (6) Vietnam War (7) VOE (1) volunteers (6) vote packing (1) voter education (2) voter ID (1) voter intimidation (2) voter mobilization (1) voter registration (12) voter suppression (9) voter turnout (8) voter-owned elections (1) voters (7) voters for obama (2) voting (1) voting problems (1) voting rights (1) vp (1) Waldenbooks (2) Wall Street (2) walter mondale (1) war (6) war in iraq (5) war on terror (4) war on women (1) war profits (1) War Resisters League (1) war toys (1) war weary (1) waste (2) waterboarding (1) wealth (2) white supremacy (3) Whittle Communications (1) Winona LaDuke (3) Wisconsin (2) women (1) Woodrow Wilson (1) Woodstock (1) workers (1) workplace discrimination (1) World War One (1) xenophobia (2) Yippie! (1) Yitzhak Rabin (1) you're fired (1) young voters (1) youth (1) youth empowerment (2) youtube (1) Yusef Hawkins (1) Zionism (2)

Even More Outrage via Leftweets.org

Twitter Outrage News Feed